I don’t want Facebook to have any more say in how we communicate over the Internet. Otherwise, technology companies will use decisions like these to exert even more influence and control over our lives.įrom my perspective, the Oversight Board sounds too much like something out of 1984. If we have learned anything over the past five years or so, it’s that we need to look long and hard before allowing Big Tech to expand its spectacular and tentacular reach. No matter how judicial Zuckerberg wants his Oversight Board to appear to be, it’s a Silicon Valley creation. Language like this is the stuff of corporate position papers and annual reports. The board’s role is to ensure that Facebook’s rules and processes are consistent with its content policies, its values, and its human rights commitments.” “It is Facebook’s role to create necessary and proportionate penalties that respond to severe violations of its content policies. Nor would our high court use language such as:
6 severely violated Facebook’s Community Standards,” is something a Supreme Court justice would never write. The Facebook Oversight Board on Thursday released two rulings overturning Meta's decisions to remove user posts from its platforms, saying the content did not actually violate the company's policies.
FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT FOR FREE
Ensuring respect for free expression and human rights on Facebook and Instagram through binding decisions on.
FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT UPDATE
But the Oversight Board says it will publish its first transparency report next month, which will provide an update on cross check, as well as its assessment of how Facebook is following its recommendations.Įditor’s note: This article originally appeared on Engadget.“The board found that the two posts by Mr. Oversight Board 5461 followers on LinkedIn. The company declined to comment on the board’s statement. It’s not clear how much more information Facebook plans to share with the Oversight Board. The group also notes that Facebook didn’t provide specifics data it had asked for about how cross check works. “In our decision concerning former US President Donald Trump’s accounts, we warned that a lack of clear public information on cross-check and Facebook’s ‘newsworthiness exception’ could contribute to perceptions that Facebook is unduly influenced by political and commercial considerations,” the board writes. The cross check system was also one of the central issues in the decision about Donald Trump’s suspension from Facebook. The report also stated that Facebook had ‘misled’ the Oversight Board when it said it was “not feasible” to share more information about cross check, and that the system only impacted a “small number” of accounts. But according to The WSJ, these extra checks are often very delayed or don’t happen at all, effectively allowing famous people to break the platform’s rules without consequences. Facebook has said the rules are meant to provide an extra lawyer of scrutiny to potential rule-breaking posts from high-profile accounts. The Board is committed to publishing its decisions and rationale.
There are 20 members on the board with backgrounds ranging from. The Oversight Board reviews a select number of highly emblematic cases and determines if Facebook’s decisions were made in accordance with its stated values. The statement comes one week after The Wall Street Journal reported on internal memos that raised significant issues with the “cross check” system. The Oversight Board is an effort by Facebook to bring in outside expertise to oversee the platform's content moderation decisions. “We expect to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will be reporting what we hear from this as part of our first release of quarterly transparency reports which we will publish in October.” “In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,” the board said in a statement. The Oversight Board is pushing Facebook to provide more information on its controversial “cross-check” system, following a report that the company has allowed celebrities, politicians and other public figures to break its rules.
0 kommentar(er)
